 | 3 Dimensional Chess |
Divide and you will find!
Wild name, real hobbies
Wild name, real hobbies
brucehum
♡ 76 ( +1 | -1 )
some stats Hello all.
Here some stats. As all stats, they are not the definitive word on anything! I present them here just for fun.
Some players had bad health, some other had other problems, etc.
They are based on chessgames.com, plus a bit of excel.
PLAYER + - = total % %win
Morphy 174 20 15 209 86,84 83,25
Alekhine 1217 280 557 2054 72,81 59,25
Fischer 453 88 268 809 72,56 56,00
Keres 1139 236 893 2268 69,91 50,22
Kasparov 926 163 901 1990 69,17 46,53
Botvinnik 624 154 486 1264 68,59 49,37
Lasker 246 74 149 469 68,34 52,45
Capablanca 206 41 216 463 67,82 44,49
Pillsbury 233 92 96 421 66,75 55,34
Fine 177 61 119 357 66,25 49,58
Tal 1271 336 1455 3062 65,27 41,51
Euwe 647 239 451 1337 65,26 48,39
Rubinstein 329 126 222 677 64,99 48,60
Najdorf 672 218 635 1525 64,89 44,07
Karpov 1136 287 1475 2898 64,65 39,20
Steinitz 350 164 121 635 64,65 55,12
Korchnoi 1710 673 1731 4114 62,60 41,57
Petrosian 675 187 1104 1966 62,41 34,33
Schlechter 307 124 336 767 61,93 40,03
Spassky 754 246 1329 2329 60,91 32,37
Smyslov 960 357 1478 2795 60,79 34,35
Bronstein 683 297 865 1845 60,46 37,02
Chigorin 410 248 138 796 60,18 51,51
Nimzowistch 206 112 182 500 59,40 41,20
Reshevsky 201 121 330 652 56,13 30,83
Reti 139 106 118 363 54,55 38,29
More: Chess Vs Computer
ughaibu
♡ 31 ( +1 | -1 )
Chessgames.com is an excellent site but the
database is quite unreliable for this kind of thing. Of
world champions Lasker had by far the best %
Capablanca was second, slightly ahead of Fischer.
When you consider the respective lengths of career
of these players I think it's difficult to overstate the
extraordinary strength of Lasker.
More: Games Chess