 | Chess Maniac |
Vote and you will uncover!
Crazy name, real matters
Crazy name, real matters
furious
12 ( +1 | -1 )
Bishops Gambit Why? Why sacrifice a castling possiblility when u can end up in almost the same situation by tossing out your king knight first?
More: Multiplayer Chess
silverq
16 ( +1 | -1 )
Do you mean that you want to castle in a different way instead of playing "0-0" by dislodging your knight on g1? And if so, what does this do with a Bishop gambit?
More: Learning Chess
tovmauzer
18 ( +1 | -1 )
The question is... probably about KG line (e4 e5 f4 Bc4). I think that main idea is to prevent d5. Brunetti can obviously say more:)
More: Chess Here
atrifix
26 ( +1 | -1 )
Actually the PROBLEM is with ...d5. Qh4+ has been seen less and less because it exposes the queen too early, not nearly enough to justify preventing White's 0-0. The real problem with 3. Bc4 is that it exposes the bishop to attack by a timely ...d5, returning material for counterdevelopment.
More: Wholesale Chess
triangulator
6 ( +1 | -1 )
where is brunetti i havent seen him post something in a long time
More: Blitz Chess
furious
13 ( +1 | -1 )
Yeah Thats what I mean, alot of good players have played the bishops opening...Alekhine, Fischer, Polger...
More: Chess Grandmaster
brunetti